The data Ted Frank discussed includes:
Michael Delikat & Morris M. Kleiner, An Empirical Study of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Where Do Plaintiffs Better Vindicate Their Rights?, 58 Dispute Resolution Journal 56, 57-58 (2004).
Employee claimants prevailed 46% of the time in arbitration compared to 34% in federal court.Lewis L. Maltby, Private Justice: Employment Arbitration and Civil Rights, 30 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 29, 45-48 (1998).
Employees prevailed over employers in 63% of employment arbitration cases filed with the American Arbitration Association between 1993 and 1995. To compare, only 14.9% of employees who brought cases to federal district court in 1994 prevailed in their litigation.Mark Fellows, The Same Results As In Court, More Efficiently: Comparing Arbitration And Court Litigation Outcomes, Metropolitan Corporate Counsel 32 (July 2006).
When consumers bring arbitration claims against businesses, the consumers prevail in 65.5% of cases that reach a decision. To compare, buyer plaintiffs litigating contract claims in the 75 largest American counties prevailed 61.5% of the time overall, and 60.9% of the time in cases decided by bench trials. When businesses bring arbitration claims against California consumers, the businesses prevail in 77.7% of cases that reach a decision. To compare, seller plaintiffs litigating contract cases in the largest 75 counties prevail 76.8% of the time overall and 78.9% of the time in cases decided by bench trial.The benefits of arbitration have made it a vital element of the modern civil justice system. These benefits include the same outcomes as in court, affordability, speed, efficiency, fairness, flexibility, taxpayer savings and legal enforceability.












0 comments:
Post a Comment